We do a lot of expatriation work. I get asked all the time “Why do people want to give up their U.S. citizenship?” Most recently, a reporter asked me this question today. I want to expand on the blog about one of the comments I made to her.
One reason is estate tax. This is not the only reason, and not the dominant reason. But I predict that you will start to see a steady rise of expatriations in the Middle East particularly, and less so in Asia, for the reason I am about to describe.
In the Middle East it is common for very large (VERY large) enterprises to be family-owned. The patriarch starts the company, or maybe two brothers. They are successful, and pass the business down to the next generation.
At some point, one of two things happens. One of the men (and it is men who own and operate these companies) marries an American woman, and their children are U.S. citizens. Or — equally common — the pregnant wife will fly to the United States to give birth to the children. The children are then U.S. citizens.
Eventually, the current owner dies and the U.S. citizen children inherit his share of the company.
Here is what happens:
The U.S. citizen children are now shareholders of a foreign corporation (or partners in a foreign partnership in the less-likely event that the business is treated as such). If they own enough of the business, they are looking at Controlled Foreign Corporation status for the business. This means possible leakage of financial information to the U.S. government on Form 5471. For a company whose affairs never have and never will touch the United States, this causes considerable disgruntlement among the other family members who are shareholders. (That’s an understatement, by the way).
Most normal business enterprises have a variety of companies within the structure, and it is more than likely that one or two of these will be considered to be PFICs. Again, information leakage.
The U.S. citizen children become officers and directors of the family business, along with their cousins and uncles. All of a sudden you have potential exposure to the various sanctions regimes (don’t do business with Iran, Sudan, etc. etc.), the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the anti-boycott stuff (see Form 5713), and other exciting accoutrements of U.S. foreign policy and domestic morality. The companies I see might do business anywhere from Nigeria to Khazakstan. Business operations become problematic. The U.S. shareholders, having newly inherited their shares, are quickly becoming toxic to the business operations.
As officers and directors, these new U.S. citizen shareholders are probably signatories on the company’s bank accounts. FBAR disclosures. They must tell the U.S. government where the family business banks and how much money the business has in its accounts. Information leakage again.
Our friend Mr. FATCA comes to visit. U.S. persons are involved in this company as officers, directors, and shareholders. Perhaps the company’s bank for the last 30 years becomes a little less enthralled with continuing the banking relationships, at least on the favorable terms that the family business has enjoyed.
One of our U.S. citizen children, let’s say, heads up the division of the company that is doing business in Afghanistan. He flies in and out of Kabul regularly, and sometimes has close calls with destiny. He is paying 40% income tax on his salary and, dodging the occasional Taliban rocket, feels he deserves every penny of that salary. Meanwhile, his cousin — a noncitizen — is running operations in West Africa, and pulling the same salary. Things are not exactly a country club for him, either. But he’s not paying a penny in income tax. A certain personal disgruntlement arises in the U.S. citizen son who has inherited a piece of the family business. “I’m paying 40% for what? The black helicopters aren’t coming for me; quite the contrary.”
Eventually, our U.S. citizen son dies, after a long and fruitful career. He inherited 1/3 of the family business from his father, and when he dies owns stock worth $500,000,000. His uncles and cousins — nonresident aliens all — own the rest of the company. Shari’a law tells everyone who inherits what. The U.S. government wants estate tax, though. How will his heirs find the $200,000,000 (I’m assuming a 40% estate tax rate) to pay the U.S. Treasury — wealth created outside the United States, none of which ever touched the United States or received any protection or services from the United States Government? The family business is blown apart. Our U.S. citizen’s heirs must sell their share of the business to the rest of the family in order to pay the U.S. estate tax.
It is for reasons like this that I travel so frequently to the Middle East. Expatriation is the only long term solution. The senior members of these families are pressuring the younger generation give up U.S. citizenship to protect against these problems. I have heard the ultimatum from the father to the son: “The business or your U.S. passport. You choose.”
I want to emphasize that I do not hear political rants from my clients, or from the other family members who must deal with having a U.S. citizen shareholder thrust upon them. Everyone I talk to is eager to travel to the United States, enjoys meeting Americans, and bears no ill will to anyone.
But faced with the prospect of destroying the family business or giving up the U.S. passport, it is no contest. The passport has to go.
Phil Hodgen
Philip D. W. Hodgen is the principal attorney of HodgenLaw PC, an international tax law firm based in Pasadena, California. He earned his undergraduate degree from Claremont McKenna College and his law degree from the School of Law at the University of California, Los Angeles. He then went on to earn a Master of Laws degree with a specialty in taxation from the University of San Diego School of Law. Admitted to the California bar in 1982, Phil spent nine years in law firms and with a large U.S. bank before starting his own firm in 1991.
Phil is a past chair of the International Tax Committee of the State Bar of California's Tax Section and was a member of the Executive Committee of the State Bar of California's Tax Section for 2004-2007. Phil frequently speaks on a variety of international tax, trust and estate topics to attorneys, accountants, and real estate professionals.
“Expatriate” to the U.S. tax authorities means someone who: relinquishes his/her U.S. citizenship; or cancels his/her U.S. permanent residency (AKA “green card”) status, where U.S. residency has continued for at least 8 years. We help people expatriate — we handle their wranglings with the State Department and the Internal Revenue Service. So I watch for…
We’re working on a rash of cases in which people are giving up their permanent resident visas or U.S. citizenship — expatriation cases. Expect a few blog posts along the way. Key resource for you Here’s a link to the IRS website and Notice 2009-85. This notice was published in October, 2009 and is the…
Yeah I’m internet famous. Or something. I was interviewed for an article that was published in TIME Magazine, Why More U.S. Expatriates Are Turning in Their Passports. Thanks, Helena for this. Our experience is that we are getting a lot of people who are looking to bail out of the United States. By far the majority…
There is an interesting article in the latest edition of Tax Notes International: “U.S. Expats and the Offshore Crackdown,” 58 Tax Notes Int’l 619 (May 24, 2010). I would link to it and give the author (David D. Stewart) a bit of public glory but it is behind the paywall at Lexis. And I can’t…
We do nothing but international tax stuff. On the outbound side (U.S. humans and companies doing business outside the USA) we have a steady flow of questions about the foreign earned income exclusion. The Federal government has just done a review of tax returns claiming the foreign earned income exclusion and has found (shocking, I…
People who give up their U.S. citizenship or their green card visas are subjected to the exit tax. This is imposed under Section 877A of the Internal Revenue Code. The exit tax treats you as having sold all of your assets on the day before you gave up your citizenship or your green card. If…
2 Comments
The US continues to live in isolation. When it comes to possibility make investment with that wealth the US will be sitting on the side lines. The US thinks it has the most efficient deepest financial markets in the world, however, in future the flows of money will help develop Europe and the Far East further. In 2020 the US will be down to about 15% GDP with the 85% trading among themselves. This approach will not work in the long-term unless the rest of the G20 decides to adopt the US approach.
Brilliant post.
You have summarized well the insanity of the current US tax and reporting regime and its unintended – but not unanticipated – effects. International is a small part of my tax practice, but enough to be frustrated if not angered by what an increasingly bankrupt nation is doing to find the last of the nickels under the sofa cushions.
Comments are closed.
Tax laws change over time, and the information in this post above may be less accurate today than it was at the time of the last revision. This post is not tax advice for your specific situation. Please contact an international tax professional to get personalized advice for your situation.
The US continues to live in isolation. When it comes to possibility make investment with that wealth the US will be sitting on the side lines. The US thinks it has the most efficient deepest financial markets in the world, however, in future the flows of money will help develop Europe and the Far East further. In 2020 the US will be down to about 15% GDP with the 85% trading among themselves. This approach will not work in the long-term unless the rest of the G20 decides to adopt the US approach.
Brilliant post.
You have summarized well the insanity of the current US tax and reporting regime and its unintended – but not unanticipated – effects. International is a small part of my tax practice, but enough to be frustrated if not angered by what an increasingly bankrupt nation is doing to find the last of the nickels under the sofa cushions.