- Article Category
- Expatriation
Updated
PostedChild support and international divorce
Phil Hodgen
Attorney, Principal
Share
I will be speaking on November 1, 2012 (Los Angeles) and November 2, 2012 (San Francisco and on the interweb) at the 2012 Family Law Conference of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants. Here, for your reading pleasure, is a portion of the presentation materials -- installment one of five episodes. This version of the handout has all of the footnotes stripped out of it. Sorry. This is what happens when something moves from Pages to HTML while you're flying above the Indian Ocean en route from Mumbai to Dubai and you can't log into WordPress and download a handy-dandy footnote plug-in. Hypothetically speaking, of course.
Child Support
Summary
The taxation of child support in an international divorce should be the same as in a purely domestic divorce: no income tax deduction is allowed for the paying parent, and the recipient is not treated as receiving taxable income. There are no reporting requirements, either.Where you run into problems, of course, is in the edge cases. If something is labeled as child support but in fact it is not, we have to decide what it is and how it is taxed. The payment could be a property settlement payment to the spouse or former spouse. Or it could be a gift to the gift or former spouse, or to the child. These questions are explored here. Better, of course, to not play too close to the edge.Income taxation of child support
The rules for income taxation of child support are the same for international divorces as they are in the purely domestic context:- payments are not tax-deductible by the payor, and
- are not taxable income for the recipient.
No tax deduction to the payor
The parent making the child support payment does not receive an income tax deduction. If the parent is a U.S. citizen or a U.S. resident alien, the default rules of the Internal Revenue Code apply: no deduction is allowed.If the parent making the child support payments is neither a U.S. citizen nor a resident alien, then he or she is exposed to the U.S. income tax system only for U.S.-source income. There, the only possible tax deductible items will be expenses associated with the conduct of a U.S. business. Child support is self-evidently not a business expense.No taxable income for the recipient
The recipient of child support payments will have no taxable income in the United States. If the recipient is a U.S. citizen or resident alien, the Code hands us that result. If the recipient is neither, then the payments received are irrelevant for U.S. income tax purposes. A nonresident alien cares only about his or her home country income tax.Income tax treaties and child support
Whenever you are dealing with a cross-border divorce, it is wise to determine whether an income tax treaty exists between the countries of residence of the two ex-spouses. An income tax treaty may be able to trump unsatisfactory tax results in the other country.Typically, if an income tax treaty exists there will be a provision that deals explicitly with the taxation of alimony and child support. The United States has a model treaty that it uses as a starting point for its negotiations with other countries. It refers to child support, making it tax-exempt in both countries.Periodic payments . . . for the support of a child made pursuant to a written separation agreement or a decree of divorce, separate maintenance, or compulsory support, paid by a resident of a Contracting State to a resident of the other Contracting State, shall be exempt from tax in both Contracting States.The relevant provision is usually found in Article 18 of older treaties, and may or may not follow the precise language quoted from the Model.The Canadian treaty, as an example, exempts child support from income taxation in a round-about way:
. . . [C]hild support payments . . . arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of the other Contracting State shall be taxable only in that other State, but the amount included in income for the purposes of taxation in that other State shall not exceed the amount that would be included in income in the first-mentioned State if the recipient were a resident thereof.Let’s translate that into simple language. Assume a payment of child support from a U.S. citizen parent to a non-U.S. citizen minor child living in Canada. Is that child (or the custodial parent, for that matter) taxable in Canada on the child support payments received? The provision would read as follows:
. . . [C]hild support payments . . . arising in the United States and paid to a resident of Canada shall be taxable only in Canada, but the amount included in income for the purposes of taxation in Canada shall not exceed the amount that would be included in income in the United States if the recipient were a resident thereof.Since the United States does not impose income tax on the recipient of child support, Canada may not, either. This demonstrates one possible use of the income tax treaties: if you can prove that the payment would be nontaxable child support in the United States, a nonresident alien custodial parent abroad may use the income tax treaty between his or her home country and the United States to trump a home country rule that would make the child support taxable.